Visual Editors discuss newspaper design, redesign, graphics, illustration, and typography.      Subscribe to RSS feed   Log in   Ning site   Forums

Forums

 

 

Visual Editors
  Start a discussion
  Contact a colleague
  Share your portfolio
  Blog your expertise
  Customize your profile
  Join a discussion
  Create a group
  Share an event
  Upload a video
  Invite your friends


Visual Editors, NFP was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit in 2004.

 
  Download This Topic
   Previous topic
   Next topic
Orlando Sentinel redesign date nears
Goto page 1, 2  Next Visual Editors Forum Index » Print   
These are legacy forums from 2004-2007.  Visit the new Visual Editors.

charles apple

Superhero

Superhero

Joined: 09 Mar 2004


Posts: 3734

Posted:
Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:04 am

Reply with quote
 
Newsdesigner blogger Mark Friesen has posted a few pages of the redesign of the Orlando Sentinel which begins phasing in later this month.

The big change, of course, will be A1. All Mark has so far are the biz pages that have apparently already debuted. Old on the left; new on the right:



Here’s one that shows the new section flag:



Check out Mark’s coverage here:
http://www.newsdesigner.com/archives/002422.php
_________________
-Charles
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bburton

Bo

Bo

Joined: 18 May 2004


Posts: 536

Posted:
Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:56 pm

Reply with quote
 
Well, I can show you what it WON'T look like (a few rethought prototypes, nixed by either focus groups or top editors):

NOT the Orlando Sentinel Tabloid:




NOT an ode to our cousins in Chicago:Wink




NOT our Rolling Stone-inspired update:Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad




NOT a daily spadea that would wrap the front and be chock-full of fun things to get out and do that day:




NOT its cute little brother, "The Skinny" narrower spadea:




And NOT the way we design our front page now:




Looks like all systems are go for a Jan. 29 launch. Stay tuned and wish us luck...
_________________
http://web.mac.com/boburton/iWeb/boburton
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Robb Montgomery

Founder

Founder

Joined: 07 Mar 2004


Posts: 1504

Posted:
Fri Jan 06, 2006 9:29 pm

Reply with quote
 
Yippee!

Wow, that was fun, Bo!


Can't wait. And you are, gonna podcast and zoomify your debut with all of us at Vizeds in the redesign wing of VizEds?

I'm putting that date on my iCal right now.

Jan. 29 you say?

Hmm. Sounds like a plane trip to me, you know, for the interview.





Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool
_________________
Where in the world is Robb?
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Lucritia Edgerton

Secret Agent

Secret Agent

Joined: 01 Sep 2004


Posts: 97

Posted:
Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:41 pm

Reply with quote
 
One thing I'm noticing is the reduction of copy on the front, something I personally love.

I have an editor who loves the New York Times look and many gray inches of copy. How did you sell this redesign to your powers that be?
_________________
We are well and truly frakked.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
bburton

Bo

Bo

Joined: 18 May 2004


Posts: 536

Posted:
Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:55 pm

Reply with quote
 
Actually, that part came easy. Our editor, Charlotte H. Hall, spend 25 years at Newsday. So we've slowly been taking more cues from tabloids: ie, shorter stories, more conversational headlines, alternative story forms, photography played boldly, story selection based on what's "interesting," not just what's "important"...

As a New Yorker, Charlotte also loves the Times. But she knows that we're not the Times and never should be. She and our publisher, Kathy Waltz, understand the Orlando market skews younger, is kinda quirky and doesn't have much spare time. It's also a diverse, transitory community without a real "there" there, and they want the paper to be the local town center. So the coming design improvements are meant to reflect that.

Basically, we didn't have to sell the powers-that-be because we have a mandate from them: More change implemented faster. As you can see, many of our most radical ideas were too much change. But that kind of blue-sky reaching really helped the newsroom get excited about what's coming ahead - and maybe helped writers feel better that it's not as radical as it could have been?

And really, who's going to miss GOP YIELDS TO INQUIRIRY OF DELAY on the front page? That might be one tip I can offer for selling new concepts: find pages that have awful examples of wasted newshole and show how the local writing gets more emphasis when that kind of stuff is removed.

P.S. Use the research to back you - the Readership Institute and Eyetrack studies support this kind of packaging. Readers don't enjoy the New York Times because they're seduced by long blocks of type without a lot of visual oomph, they enjoy it because it's the best writing out there.

You might also want to take a close look at another editor favorite, the Wall Street Journal, which has gone absolutely charticle-crazy in a very sophisticated way since Ron & Mario Garcia updated it....
_________________
http://web.mac.com/boburton/iWeb/boburton
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
scavendish

VizEds Moderator

VizEds Moderator

Joined: 08 Mar 2004


Posts: 761

Posted:
Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:04 pm

Reply with quote
 
I knew you wanted to skew younger . . .



. . . but is there really much money in the under-6 crowd. Very Happy
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
charles apple

Superhero

Superhero

Joined: 09 Mar 2004


Posts: 3734

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:11 am

Reply with quote
 
"Pink eye." Gawd, that's funny...
_________________
-Charles
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bburton

Bo

Bo

Joined: 18 May 2004


Posts: 536

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 9:51 am

Reply with quote
 
Pink Eye - it's contagious! Catch it today!!!

What, you don't like our flamingo? This was a total joke, but somehow it got shown to the big-wigs in Chicago. Beautiful! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy

I guess that's the only other real strategy that's worked for me: Make 'em laugh along the way, it wins you a different kind of bond with your editors. Mine, for instance, HATES Paris Hilton (who owns a night club here). So, I naturally build Paris into every prototype I do. During a discussion over 1A, we were told by our marketing folks that we couldn't mess with our nameplate too much right now, and they compared our brand recognition to Chlorox. Chlorox! Rolling Eyes My editor and I were both bummed. You should have seen the Chlorox front page! I mean, you have to laugh along the way or things just get too discouraging.
_________________
http://web.mac.com/boburton/iWeb/boburton
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Megan Lavey

Maestro

Maestro

Joined: 30 Apr 2004


Posts: 788

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:48 pm

Reply with quote
 
Well, look at it this way. Clorox is an indispensible brand and it does make your whites whiter! Very Happy

<someone insert witty joke here>
_________________
"I solemnly swear that I am up to no good." - Mauraders Map from Harry Potter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
JoshGillin

Maestro

Maestro

Joined: 11 Jun 2004


Posts: 261

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:55 pm

Reply with quote
 
Out of curiosity, is this a redesign in the sense that the content is changing or being reorganized, or is it simply cosmetic?
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
 
  Download This Topic
   Previous topic
   Next topic
Orlando Sentinel redesign date nears
Goto page 1, 2  Next Visual Editors Forum Index » Print   
 
VizEds was founded by Robb Montgomery  |   Contact   |  Terms

©2004 - 2010, Visual Editors, NFP - All Rights Reserved.